A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours over the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has developed into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, search for to make their household property. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their organizing authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their web-site, bringing about an encroachment with a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to strict controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically within a sensitive coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, that is partially built, is in the right placement. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their watch, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, the place views of The ocean are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, a picture that has considering that grow to be emblematic of the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Moments claimed, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water throughout serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the site became Among the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of steps ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second from the legal timeline.
Within the core in the dispute is really a disagreement about boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as manufactured, goes over and above what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and ailments attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is determined by problem for environmental protection and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal see, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just endeavoring to produce a loved ones home in accordance Using the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that all will work are completed depending on Skilled assistance and permitted options. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, will not alter the underlying information.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over building of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for the situation that lots of observers see as significantly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become far more contentious.
The Irish Periods post about René Collier pointed out that the businessman had Earlier been linked to local advocacy on arranging and environmental difficulties, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from incredibly unique Qualified backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical fact from the coastline and the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive technique.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result remains unsure. The court docket must ascertain if the wall as designed complies with organizing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and organizing conditions. However the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living alongside each other lengthy following the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong over and above that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 like a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Furthermore, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic problems such as environmental security and residence legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of pure magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. No matter if it can eventually be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable go on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more carefully viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.